[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16825144#comment-16825144
 ] 

Sven Meier commented on WICKET-6656:
------------------------------------

No specific date yet, 8.4.0 is only 20 days old.

For now you can pull the updated PropertyValidator into your project and always 
let #isRequired() return false.

> JSR 303 - @NotNull validation problems 
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-6656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6656
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket-bean-validation
>    Affects Versions: 9.0.0-M1, 8.4.0
>            Reporter: Sebastian
>            Assignee: Sven Meier
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 8.5.0, 9.0.0-M2
>
>
> Hi there,
> we are using JSR 303 validations. But regarding the NotNull validation, the 
> behaviour differs from the other validations.
> On a validation-violation the given message key of NotNull isn't used.
> We recognized, that the method FormComponent.validate() contains a condition 
> to check if the required flag of a FormComponent is set. If the flag is set 
> to true NotNull JSR validations aren't validated.
> On the other hand there is a default validator 
> org.apache.wicket.bean.validation.PropertyValidator (wicket-bean-validation) 
> which sets the required field to true if there is a NotNull validation added 
> to a field.
> If we want to get full JSR 303 support, we need to implement 
> INullAcceptingValidator. But this requires that the required field of 
> FormComponent will always be false.
> The problem is, that we use the required field beside validation for some 
> other functionality in the rendering phase.
> It would be very helpful, if Wicket completly supports JSR 303 without having 
> a restriction on the usage of the FormComponent.
> Do you have a suggestion regarding this issue?
>  
> Thank you.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to