[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17986376#comment-17986376
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on WICKET-7159:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 57b340e79da6ed53e3ba50df3ef0ff30494d0341 in wicket's branch 
refs/heads/master from Miroslav Silhavy
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=wicket.git;h=57b340e79d ]

WICKET-7159 - Remove isEnabledInHierarchy condition


> IFormValidator Skipped When Any Dependent Component is Disabled in Wicket 10.x
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-7159
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7159
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Miroslav Silhavy
>            Priority: Major
>
> Regression causing a breaking behavior in Wicket 10, caused by change 
> WICKET-3899. Discussed here 
> [https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/1033#discussion_r2104060257].
> Short description
>  * After upgrading to Wicket 10.x, form validators ({{{}IFormValidator{}}}) 
> are not executed if any dependent form component is disabled, due to the 
> addition of anĀ {{isEnabledInHierarchy()}} check. This breaks backward 
> compatibility for applications that rely on validators with conditionally 
> enabled/disabled fields or a field with multiple radio buttons, as the 
> validator is now skipped in these cases. This impacts forms with validation 
> logic and causes migration issues for existing Wicket 9 applications. A flag 
> or configuration to restore the previous behavior, or reverting the change, 
> is needed for backward compatibility.
>  * Common UI patterns with conditionally enabled/disabled fields no longer 
> work with form validators
>  * We must restructure validators and implement complex enabled/disabled 
> field checking in {{getDependentFormComponents()}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to