Author: niclas
Date: Sun Jun 14 00:02:23 2015
New Revision: 1685346

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685346
Log:
Aligning the trademarks question with the ASF policies and link to branding.

Modified:
    zest/site/src/community/licensing_faq.html

Modified: zest/site/src/community/licensing_faq.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/zest/site/src/community/licensing_faq.html?rev=1685346&r1=1685345&r2=1685346&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- zest/site/src/community/licensing_faq.html (original)
+++ zest/site/src/community/licensing_faq.html Sun Jun 14 00:02:23 2015
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ layout: default
             "Qi4j experts" or that we conduct "Advanced Qi4j training"?
             </dt>
             <dd>
-                <strong>A</strong>: Yes, the "fair use" license to the Qi4j 
trademarks allows third-party to use the Qi4j marks in
-                such manner. If in doubt, contact the Qi4j Community.
+                <strong>A</strong>: The Apache Software Foundation has a 
unified <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/";>trademarks and 
branding policy</a>, which covers this question. This is somewhat more strict 
than the pre-ASF policy in the Qi4j project, and if you have any doubts, please 
contact the Apache Zest project for clarification. The intent of the Project 
Management Committee is to lean towards "permissible" rather than 
"exclusionary", as long as credit is given where credit is due. 
<strong>Also</strong> be aware that all references to "Qi4j" MUST be together 
with "Apache Zest", such as "Apache Zest Qi4j" or "Qi4j subproject at Apache 
Zest". 
             </dd>
         </dl>
 


Reply via email to