Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Hadoop Wiki" for change 
notification.

The "Avro/Specification2Proposals" page has been changed by JohnPlevyak.
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Avro/Specification2Proposals

--------------------------------------------------

New page:
= Avro 2.0 Specification Proposals =

== Optional Fields ==

=== Arguments in Favor ===

 * Large sets of very sparse optional fields have a variety of uses, e.g. tags
 * Some other serialization systems have direct support for optional fields
 * Avro can handle missing fields by providing a default value however this can 
be inefficient for sparse sets of options and more complex since the default 
value doubles as the "empty" marker
 * Avro can handle optional fields as a vector of a union of all the optional 
fields.  While this works, it makes quickly determining whether or not a 
particular fields is present complex and inefficient.  Annotations can be used 
to decrease the API complexity but that argues for making optional a top level 
concept.
 * Support for fast "select" of sparse optional fields from a top level record 
would benefit certain applications.

=== Proposal ===

An additional field attribute:

    * "optional" - with values "true"/"false" (where "false" is assumed)

For the encoding, any record which includes optional fields
would be prefixed by an presence map which would be a sequence of int8 x* where:

 * x > 0 : the lower 7 bits are presence bits for the next 7 optional fields 
(low bit first)
 * -128 < x < 0 : the next present field is position x + 135 (as x runs from 0 
to -127 and the first 7
must be empty otherwise we would use the x > 0 encoding)
 * x == -128: no optional fields present in the next 134 optional fields
 * x = 0 : end of sequence

further, if the map has covered all the options, the end-of-sequence marker can 
be
elided. For example, a type with 3 optional fields would require only a single 
byte.

This will permit encoding at 8/7 of a bit per present entry (worst case) and at 
a cost of
8/134 (0.06) bits/entry per all but last not-present (7.5 bytes / 1000 optional 
fields).

This encoding is backward compatible as well as schema's which do not contain 
optional
elements do not have the presence map and the encoding is therefore identical. 
Backward
compatibility can be maintained by simply using the default value for 
not-present fields.

=== Language APIs ===

Efficient support could include either an explicit presence test or a function 
which returns the value
or default value (if the field is not present). 

Reply via email to