[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-5170.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
I reverted this. Matei may move this into the Fair Share Scheduler.
> Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Jonathan Gray
> Assignee: Matei Zaharia
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
> Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch,
> tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch,
> tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch
>
>
> There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this
> jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would
> satisfy the most use cases.
> This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide
> maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however
> either would fulfill the requirements of this jira.
> Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list):
> - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max
> map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the
> Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound
> and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each
> node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are
> difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity
> added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency.
> - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have
> multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A
> limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening.
> (only works with per-node limit)
> - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this
> gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large
> cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
