I don't think 101 is a real blocker - I haven't been able to reliably produce it. HDFS-793 fixes most of the issues I've seen in practice, and we now have a new patch in branch-20 which should fix that.
127 would be nice - there's a patch on that JIRA waiting for review as below. -Todd On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > If the new release included (fixedup) hdfs-127 and hdfs-101, the hbase > crew would be big fans of an hadoop 0.20.2. > St.Ack > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it > caused > > test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a new patch up there but it has > > not been reviewed, and thus not committed. > > > > Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for these > > patches? > > > > -Todd > > > > 2010/1/26 Kay Kay <kaykay.uni...@gmail.com> > > > >> Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed as > per > >> the jira). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers > >>>> that can't wait? > >>>> > >>>> -- Owen > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
