We have been testing the HDFS append code for 0.20 (using HDFS-200, HDFS-142), but I believe it is not ready for production yet. I am guessing that there would be another two months of testing before I would classify 0.20.3 + HDFS-200 as production quality. HDFS-200 touches code paths that would get triggered even if the append-sync feature is not used, hence I would be hesitant to put it in any production release before additional testing is done (it would get ready in one/two months timeframe from now)
thanks, dhruba On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Amr Awadallah <a...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Companies wanting a 1.0 product could always pay Cloudera and get a v2 > product. > > lol :) good point Allen, lets please *not* adopt a 1.0 labeling for Apache > Hadoop :) > > Seriously though, to avoid my previous comment about 1.0 labeling being > misinterpreted, though I think the 1.0 labeling is important, I think it is > much more *urgent* and *important* to get the release cycle back in order, > which should focus on getting that done first. > > -- amr > > > On 4/1/2010 2:31 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> >> >> On 4/1/10 2:15 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" >> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >> >> >>> In terms of the significance of the 1.0 labeling, I think it's important >>> for >>> adoption. >>> >>> >> Companies wanting a 1.0 product could always pay Cloudera and get a v2 >> product. ;) >> >> >> > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
