Thanks for the link Eli. On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> We've done both, even within a branch (0.20.0 was voted on core-dev@ > and 0.20.2 on general@). The bylaws suggest general@ should be used, > which seems to make sense since we're releasing common, hdfs and mr. I > think either works as long as people know where to check. > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html > > "Voting > Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary > project development mailing list (gene...@hadoop.apache.org)" > IMO general@ isn't the primary 'development' mailing list - it's just an 'announcement' list. But, it doesn't really matter... do folks feel strongly we should restart the vote on general? Arun > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> In the past we've carried it out on common-dev: >> http://hadoop-common.472056.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Hadoop-0-21-0-candidate-2-td1181981.html >> >> Arun >> >> On Jul 28, 2011, at 5:33 PM, <milind.bhandar...@emc.com> wrote: >> >>> Somehow I remember that the 0.20.203.0 vote was carried out on general@ >>> >>> Here is a message from the archive: >>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201105.mbox/browser >>> >>> - milind >>> >>> --- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:27 PM >>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.20.204.0-rc0 >>> >>> Nope. general@ is only for announcements. >>> >>> AFAIK Votes are developer activities. >>> >>> Arun >>> >>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: >>> >>>> Shouldn't this vote be taking place on general@, instead of common-dev@? >>>> I'm >>>> under the impression that that is where all votes are supposed to take >>>> place. Please correct me if I am wrong about that. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Aaron T. Myers >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>> <gkesa...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> This issue is fixed with Eric's patch for HADOOP-7356. Since Owen is out >>>>> on >>>>> vacation Iam working on getting the release tarball. >>>>> >>>>> -Giri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/28/11 1:56 PM, "Giridharan Kesavan" <gkesa...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Myself and Eric Yang are looking into this. >>>>>> -Giri >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/28/11 12:04 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" <awittena...@linkedin.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've created a release candidate for 0.20.204.0 that I would like to >>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is available at: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.204.0-rc0/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0.20.204.0 has many fixes including disk fail in place and the new rpm >>>>> and >>>>>>>> deb packages. Fail in place allows the DataNode and TaskTracker to >>>>> continue >>>>>>>> after a hard drive fails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it still failing to build according to Jenkins? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>
