On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Matt Foley <mfo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >> So, how are we doing with 0.20.204 content and trunk given the above >> proposal? Very well, in fact. Matt, Suresh and I have done a detailed >> analysis (separate email), please take a look. > > > Here's the analysis of changes in 204 vs trunk. We believe that ALL the > changes in 204 are either already in trunk or do not need to be in trunk. > Here is the list of 204 items not already in trunk, and their > categorization. > > Please, if anyone thinks we've missed something, bring it to my attention > and if it isn't already in trunk we will get it into trunk as expeditiously > as possible. > Thanks, > --Matt
Looks good to me Matt. Thanks for doing the analysis. I think the regression wrt trunk are from the original cut of the branch and don't need to block the 204 release, ie the trunk first discussion is IMO an orthogonal thread. Thanks, Eli
