On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Kihwal Lee <kih...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I think HADOOP-8294 is a good candidate to include. Without this, a transient 
> dns problem can make a large number of data nodes unavailable.  The fix is 
> backport of HADOOP-7428.

I'm +1 on HADOOP-8294 (aka HADOOP-7428). Matt?

Reply via email to