Hey Vinod, Out of curiosity, why delete the branch? Might make spelunking for svn revs that correspond to a release hard. If we're deleting old release branches might as well delete the others (branch-0.23.0, branch-0.23.0-rc0, branch-0.23.1, branch-0.23.2, etc) as well?
Thanks, Eli On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > I checked with Nicholas also who did the only merge into branch-2.0.0-alpha > after the release and got a confirmation that I can delete the branch. > > Removing the branch now. > > Thanks, > +Vinod > > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> +1 for blowing away branch-2.0.0-alpha now, we have the release tag if >> necessary. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> On Jun 5, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I see two branches for 2.* now: branch-2 and branch-2.0.0-alpha and two >>> sections in CHANGES.txt: 2.0.1-alpha unreleased and 2.0.0-alpha released. >>> It is a little confusing, seems like branch-2.0.0-alpha was a staging >>> branch for the release and can be thrown away. >>> >>> Anyone committing patches to both branch-2 and branch-2.0.0-alpha? If not, >>> I'll blow away the later and rename the section in CHANGES.txt to branch-2. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> +Vinod >> >> -- >> Arun C. Murthy >> Hortonworks Inc. >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >
