May be you misread the proposal. This is only about nuking 2.1.0-alpha and wait for 0.23.3 to be stabilized and released. Once that happens, we can create a branch-2.1 off branch-2.
Does that sound okay? Thanks, +Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Sep 4, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Robert Evans wrote: > I am fine with that too, but it is going to be a fairly large amount of > work to pull in all of the bug fixes into 2.0 that have gone into 0.23. > There was already a lot of discussion about just rebasing 2.1 instead of > trying to merge everything back into it and 2.1 is a lot further along > then 2.0 is. Just something to be aware of. > > --Bobby Evans
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
