There's already a jira: HADOOP-8924<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8924>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote: > i've been playing around writing a couple of maven plugins, one to replace > saveversion.sh and the other to invoke protoc. they both work in windows > standard cmd (no cygwin required). together with hadoop-8887 they would > remove most of the scripting done the poms. > > (they also work in linux and osx) > > they are java based, only require having SVN GIT & PROTOC avail in the > PATH. > > if cmake works in windows, i assume hadoop-8887 would be almost there. > > this would leave the tar stitching, which is done as script to handle SO > symlinks. though i have and idea on how we could take care of it. > > i'll be creating a jira momentarily. > > thx > > Alejandro > > On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Matt Foley <mfo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > Please close HADOOP-9073 as "will not fix", citing this discussion. > > > > I'm -1 on groovy in maven. That's worse, not better. Let it sit for a > > while and let people propose simplifications of the script situation. > > > > Thanks, > > --Matt > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Radim Kolar <h...@filez.com> wrote: > > > >> result of vote is to close https://issues.apache.org/** > >> jira/browse/HADOOP-9073< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9073>and write groovy in > pom.xml variant (option number 2)? > >> >
