HAServiceProtocol.proto:21:8: Option "java_generic_services" unknown. This is probably caused by a older version of protoc in build env.
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Giridharan Kesavan <gkesa...@hortonworks.com > wrote: > by looking at the failure log : > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Hadoop/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/1950/artifact/trunk/patchprocess/trunkJavacWarnings.txt > build failed on > > [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2:exec (compile-proto) @ hadoop-common --- > > HAServiceProtocol.proto:21:8: Option "java_generic_services" unknown. > > I'm not sure if this is something to do with the build env. > > -Giri > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Binglin Chang <decst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am not sure if this problem is solved, the build still failed in > > precommit-HADOOP > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Hadoop/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/ > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Giridharan Kesavan < > > gkesa...@hortonworks.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Marking the slave offline would do. I 've mared the hadoop8 slave > > offline, > > > while I test it for builds and bring it back online later when its > good. > > > > > > > > > -Giri > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Turns out I had to both kill -9 it and chmod 000 > > > > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave in order to keep it from auto-respawning. > > > > Just a note so that once the toolchain is fixed, someone knows to > > > > re-chmod back to 755. > > > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > I'm going to kill -9 the jenkins slave on hadoop8 for now cuz it's > > > > > causing havoc on the precommit builds. I can't see another way to > > > > > administratively disable it from the Jenkins interface. > > > > > > > > > > Rajiv, Giri -- mind if I build/install protoc into /usr/local to > > match > > > > > the other slaves? We can continue the conversation about > provisioning > > > > > after, but would like to unblock the builds in the meantime. > > > > > > > > > > As for CentOS vs Ubuntu, I've got no preference. RHEL6 is probably > > > > > preferable since it's a more common install platform, anyway. But, > > > > > we'll still need to have a custom toolchain for things like protoc > > 2.4 > > > > > which don't have new enough versions in the package repos. > > > > > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Colin McCabe < > cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> In addition to protoc, can someone please also install a 32-bit > C++ > > > > compiler? > > > > >> > > > > >> The builds are all failing on this machine because of that. > > > > >> > > > > >> regards, > > > > >> Colin > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Giridharan Kesavan > > > > >> <gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > > >>> When I configured the other machines I used the source to compile > > and > > > > >>> install the protoc, as the 2.4.1 wasn't available in the ubuntu > > repo. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> BTW installed 2.4.1 on asf008. > > > > >>> gkesavan@asf008:~$ protoc --version > > > > >>> libprotoc 2.4.1 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -Giri > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Hey folks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> It looks like hadoop8 has recently come back online as a build > > > slave, > > > > >>>> but is failing all the builds because it has an ancient version > of > > > > >>>> protobuf (2.2.0): > > > > >>>> todd@asf008:~$ protoc --version > > > > >>>> libprotoc 2.2.0 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> In contrast, other slaves have 2.4.1: > > > > >>>> todd@asf001:~$ protoc --version > > > > >>>> libprotoc 2.4.1 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> asf001 has the newer protoc in /usr/local/bin but asf008 does > not. > > > > >>>> Does anyone know how software is meant to be deployed on these > > build > > > > >>>> slaves? I'm happy to download and install protobuf 2.4.1 into > > > > >>>> /usr/local on asf008 if manual installation is the name of the > > game, > > > > >>>> but it seems like we should be doing something a little more > > > > >>>> reproducible than one-off builds by rando developers to manage > our > > > > >>>> toolchain on the Jenkins slaves. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -Todd > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Todd Lipcon > > > > >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Todd Lipcon > > > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Todd Lipcon > > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > > >
