Have we agreed (and stated it somewhere proper) that a -1 obtained for a Windows CI build for a test-patch will not block the ongoing work (unless it is Windows specific) and patches may still be committed to trunk despite that?
I'm +1 if someone can assert and add the above into the formal guidelines. I'd still prefer that Windows does its releases separately as that ensures more quality for its audience and better testing periods (and wouldn't block anything), but we can come to that iff we are unable to maintain the currently proposed model. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding), > > Windows support is attractive for lots users. > From point a view from Hadoop developer, Matt said that CI supports > cross platform testing, and it's quite reasonable condition to merge. > > Thanks, > Tsuyoshi -- Harsh J
