On 23 April 2013 17:25, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi! > > Now that Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha is released I'd like > to open up a discussion on what practical steps > would it take for us as a community to get > Hadoop 2.X from alpha to beta? > > There's quite a few preconditions to be met for a piece of > software to reach beta status. Quite a few of them are now > being discussed in a neighboring thread 'Compatibility in > Apache Hadoop' ( http://s.apache.org/VE1 ) but I'd like to > kick off a broader discussion: what do you think a *complete* > list should look like, before we can honestly signal this > change to the rest of the world. > > It would be very nice if the things that are offered as part > of the criteria are easily quantifiable, but lets brainstorm > first anyway. We can always stack-rank and quantify later. > > I need to get YARN-117 in before the service lifecycle is frozen forever
