Tim, This is great! I'll take a look at some of these patches, welcome!
Arun On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Tim St Clair wrote: > Greetings Hadoop Development Community, > > As some of you are aware, we've been looking to bring the upstream 2.X series > into the Fedora channels. We believe that there are several benefits that > this can bring to the community: > > - Updated & streamlined rpm packaging > - Deeper level of system integration > - System managed dependencies (security + defect tracking) > - Proving ground for OpenJDK7 > - Greater exposure for the community (both adoption and defect tracking) > ... > > During our evaluation (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop), we've > come across some build issues as they relate to Fedora packaging guidelines > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java). Most of these issues (listed > below) are very minor dependency changes, and we were wondering if there are > folks who would be willing to review. > > fedora-patch-math: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594 > fedora-patch-collections: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 > fedora-patch-cglib: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 > fedora-patch-jersey: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 > fedora-patch-jets3t: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9623 (uber > deprecated) > > There are other patches we have in the queue but they still need to be > flushed out, and in an effort to follow the KISS principles we figure this > would be a good start. > > Cheers, > Tim -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
