YARN-1089, which reforms CPU as a resource, is an incompatible change that will need to go into 2.2.0. Should it go into 2.1.1-beta as well?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>wrote: > We still need to resolve some symlink issues; are we planning to spin a new > RC? Leaving it as-is is not a good option. > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> > > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.1.1-beta that I > > would like to get > > > released - this release fixes a number of bugs on top of > > hadoop-2.1.0-beta as a result of significant amounts of testing. > > > > > > If things go well, this might be the last of the *beta* releases of > > hadoop-2.x. > > > > > > The RC is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.1.1-beta-rc0 > > > The RC tag in svn is here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.1-beta-rc0 > > > > > > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > > > > > > Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 > days. > > > > Short of HDFS-5225 from the Bigtop perspective this RC gets a +1. > > > > All tests passed in both secure and unsecure modes in 4 nodes > > pseudo distributed cluster with all the members of Hadoop > > ecosystem running smoke tests. > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > >
