+1

Thanks for driving this, Andrew.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B <vinayakum...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1,
>
> -Vinay
> On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi common-dev,
> > >>
> > >> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the
> > standard
> > >> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding
> > votes,
> > >> but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
> > >>
> > >> If the vote passes, I'll put the text on the website somewhere as
> > >> recommended by Steve.
> > >>
> > >> Previous discussion threads:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCAGB5D2bPWeV2Hk%2B67%3DDamWpVfLTM6nkjb_wG3n4%3DWAN890zqfA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCAGB5D2aDXujQjwdmadVtg2-qrPAJeOgCS2_NHydv8jke8or1UA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>
> > >> Proposal:
> > >>
> > >> ====
> > >>
> > >> Feature branch development can use either a merge or rebase workflow,
> as
> > >> decided by contributors working on the branch.
> > >>
> > >> When using a rebase workflow, the feature branch is periodically
> > rebased on
> > >> trunk via "git rebase trunk" and force pushed.
> > >>
> > >> Before performing a force-push, a tag should be created of the current
> > >> feature branch HEAD to preserve history. The tag should identify the
> > >> feature and date of most recent commit, e.g.
> > >> "tag_feature_HDFS-7285_2015-08-11". It can also be convenient to use a
> > >> temporary branch to review rebase conflict resolution before
> > force-pushing
> > >> the main feature branch, e.g. HDFS-7285-rebase. Temporary branches
> > should
> > >> be deleted after they are force-pushed over the feature branch.
> > >>
> > >> Developers are allowed to squash and reorder commits to make rebasing
> > >> easier. Use this judiciously. When squashing, please maintain the
> > original
> > >> commit messages in the squashed commit message to preserve history.
> > >>
> > >> When using a merge workflow, changes are periodically integrated from
> > trunk
> > >> to the branch via "git merge trunk".
> > >>
> > >> Merge conflict resolution can be reviewed by posting the diff of the
> > merge
> > >> commit.
> > >>
> > >> For both rebase and merge workflows, integration of the branch into
> > trunk
> > >> should happen via "git merge --no-ff". "--no-ff" is important since it
> > >> generates a merge commit even if the branch applies cleanly on top of
> > >> trunk. This clearly denotes the set of commits that were made on the
> > >> branch, and makes it easier to revert the branch if necessary.
> > >>
> > >> "git merge --no-ff" is also the preferred way of integrating a feature
> > >> branch to other branches, e.g. branch-2.
> > >>
> > >> ====
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Andrew
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to