+1 (non-binding) --Build from source code --Set up a pseudo-distributed cluster and Distributed HA Cluster --Ran Several jobs Slive,Terasort and pi. --All are working fine.
The footer of the Web UI "Hadoop, 2014" is old. ( I think,we can include HDFS-8149) Thanks & Regards Brahma Reddy Battula ________________________________________ From: Junping Du [j...@hortonworks.com] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:12 PM To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1 +1 (binding) with: - Download and verify signatures. - Build and deploy a single node cluster. - Run some example jobs (PI, etc.) on deployed cluster. Thanks, Junping ________________________________________ From: Rohith Sharma K S <rohithsharm...@huawei.com> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 6:53 AM To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1 +1 (non-binding) Downloaded source, built package and installed 5 node cluster. 1. Verified for RMHA/RMRestart/RMWorkpreservingRestart cluster in secure/non-secure mode. 2. Attached JCarder tool to cluster for identifying deadlock cycles, No cycles found. 3. Verified cluster for high availability. 4. Ran sample MR applications with RM HA enabled. 5. Run sanity test cases and working fine. Thanks & Regards Rohith Sharma K S -----Original Message----- From: sjl...@gmail.com [mailto:sjl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sangjin Lee Sent: 18 September 2015 09:50 To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1 +1 (non-binding) Verified the signatures, set up a pseudo-distributed cluster, ran several test jobs, and ran an uber job. Also verified that the UI issue I saw on RC0 is now gone. Thanks Vinod! Sangjin On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Jian He <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Build from source code. > Deployed a local cluster. > Validated sample jobs passed. > > Jian > > > On Sep 18, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Deployed a local cluster, verified configured cluster with node > > labels, > run > > jobs with/without node labels. > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Xuan Gong <xg...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > >> Update my vote from +1 (non-binding) to +1 binding > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Xuan Gong > >> > >>> On Sep 17, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Xuan Gong <xg...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> Download and compile the source code, run several MR jobs. > >>> > >>> Xuan Gong > >>> > >>>> On Sep 16, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > >> vino...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> After a nearly month long [1] toil, with loads of help from > >>>> Sangjin > Lee > >> and > >>>> Akira Ajisaka, and 153 (RC0)+7(RC1) commits later, I've created a > >> release > >>>> candidate RC1 for hadoop-2.6.1. > >>>> > >>>> RC1 is RC0 [0] (for which I opened and closed a vote last week) + > >>>> UI > >> fixes > >>>> for the issue Sangjin raised (YARN-3171 and the dependencies > YARN-3779, > >>>> YARN-3248), additional fix to avoid incompatibility (YARN-3740), > >>>> other > >> UI > >>>> bugs (YARN-1884, YARN-3544) and the MiniYARNCluster issue (right > >>>> patch > >> for > >>>> YARN-2890) that Jeff Zhang raised. > >>>> > >>>> The RC is available at: > >> http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.6.1-RC1/ > >>>> > >>>> The RC tag in git is: release-2.6.1-RC1 > >>>> > >>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-102 > 1 > >>>> > >>>> Some notes from our release process > >>>> - - Sangjin and I moved out a bunch of items pending from 2.6.1 > >>>> [2] - non-committed but desired patches. 2.6.1 is already big as > >>>> is and is > >> late > >>>> by any standard, we can definitely include them in the next release. > >>>> - The 2.6.1 wiki page [3] captures some (but not all) of the > >>>> context > of > >>>> the patches that we pushed in. > >>>> - Given the number of fixes pushed [4] in, we had to make a bunch > >>>> of changes to our original plan - we added a few improvements > >>>> that helped > >> us > >>>> backport patches easier (or in many cases made backports > >>>> possible), > and > >> we > >>>> dropped a few that didn't make sense (HDFS-7831, HDFS-7926, > >>>> HDFS-7676, HDFS-7611, HDFS-7843, HDFS-8850). > >>>> - I ran all the unit tests which (surprisingly?) passed. (Except > >>>> for > >> one, > >>>> which pointed out a missing fix HDFS-7552). > >>>> > >>>> As discussed before [5] > >>>> - This release is the first point release after 2.6.0 > >>>> - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.6.2 in a few > >>>> weeks > >> and > >>>> then follow up with more of these. > >>>> > >>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual > >>>> 5 > days. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Vinod > >>>> > >>>> [0] Hadoop 2.6.1 RC0 vote: > http://markmail.org/thread/ubut2rn3lodc55iy > >>>> [1] Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread: > >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/wkbgkxkhntx5tlux > >>>> [2] 2.6.1 Pending tickets: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12331711 > >>>> [3] 2.6.1 Wiki page: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1 > >>>> -Working-Notes > >>>> [4] List of 2.6.1 patches pushed: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.6 > >>>> .1 > >>>> %20and%20labels%20%3D%20%222.6.1-candidate%22 > >>>> [5] Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release: > >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/sbykjn5xgnksh6wg > >>>> > >>>> PS: > >>>> - Note that branch-2.6 which will be the base for 2.6.2 doesn't > >>>> have > >> these > >>>> fixes yet. Once 2.6.1 goes through, I plan to rebase branch-2.6 > >>>> based > >> off > >>>> 2.6.1. > >>>> - The additional patches in RC1 that got into 2.6.1 all the way > >>>> from > 2.8 > >>>> are NOT in 2.7.2 yet, this will be done as a followup. > >>> > >> > >> > >
