Did we consider cutting a branch-3 that borrows relatively compatible patches from trunk to run the 3.x line? That said, I would like for us to really tighten our compatibility policies and actually stick to them starting the next major release.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Vinod Vavilapalli <vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I’ll let others comment on specific features. > > Regarding the 3.x vs 2.x point, as I noted before on other threads, given > all the incompatibilities in trunk it will be ways off before users can run > their production workloads on a 3.x release. Therefore, as I was proposing > before, we should continue the 2.x lines, but soon get started on rolling > out a release candidate based off trunk. > > Like with 2.8, I’d like to go back and prepare some notes on trunk’s > content so we can objectively discuss about it. > > +Vinod
