Update:

It seems "git log" diff compare has some bugs that cherry-picks cannot be
recognized properly sometimes.

Worked with Vinod to directly compare JIRA tickets and git log result. We
finally found 20 JIRAs (list below) which fix version is 2.8.0 and not in
branch-2.8. I've backported all of them to branch-2.8, run build and pushed
to branch-2.8.

> YARN-4416
> YARN-4225
> YARN-4293
> YARN-4440
> YARN-4418
> YARN-4309
> YARN-3946
> HDFS-8326
> YARN-3623 (YARN-3623-Addendum)
> YARN-4424
> YARN-4422
> YARN-4392
> HDFS-8831
> HDFS-9490
> YARN-4419
> YARN-4405
> HDFS-9484
> HDFS-9436
> YARN-4292
> YARN-4398

Please check if any of your patches is in branch-2 only but fix version is
2.8.0.

Will update JIRAs as well.

Thanks,
Wangda


On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vino...@apache.org> wrote:

> In fact, 3 out of those 4 bugs are part of a bigger umbrella refactor
> effort.
>
> So I don’t see any problem as of now.
>
> +Vinod
>
> > On Dec 17, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vino...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Wangda,
> >
> > I see just 13 tickets *only in 2.9.0* (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20%28YARN%2C%20MAPREDUCE%2C%20HDFS%2C%20HADOOP%29%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.9.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> ).
> >
> > If you leave the new features / improvements, I see only 4 bugs (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20%28YARN%2C%20HDFS%2C%20MAPREDUCE%2C%20HADOOP%29%20AND%20issuetype%20not%20in%20%28Improvement%2C%20%22New%20Feature%22%29%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.9.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> ).
> >
> > So, we don’t need any drastic measures?
> >
> > Thanks
> > +Vinod
> >
> >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I found there're lots of commits are in branch-2 only.
> >> Ran "git log branch-2.8..branch-2".
> >>
> >> There're 35 commits for YARN, 41 commits for HDFS and 12 commits for
> >> COMMON. Only several of them are placed in 2.9.0 section in CHANGES.txt.
> >>
> >> I think we can either hard reset branch-2.8 to branch-2 and make
> necessary
> >> changes such as revert 2.9.0-only patches or backport them one by one.
> Any
> >> suggestions?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Wangda
> >
>
>

Reply via email to