+1 assuming we get the technical issues sorted. I'll give your patch a go
today.

As Steve mentioned on the JIRA, unsupported JVM is called out as an
exception in the compatibility guidelines:

"The JVM requirements will not change across point releases within the same
minor release except if the JVM version under question becomes unsupported"

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:39 PM Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:

> I've just created a patch to update branch-2 to Java 8. Not sure what's
> going to break, but hopefully all problems can be done with some selective
> changes. We know that Hadoop branch-2 builds and runs on Java 8, it being
> the java version we are already using for our branch-2 build and test runs.
>
> It's time to move on; maintenance is getting harder and harder, as well as
> more inconvenient. And while I know of clusters being deployed, they are,
> AFAIK, branch-2 on java 8 JVMs. This is just changing the language to
> reflect the reality.
>
> Before anyone asks, yes, our compatibility guidelines cover this; we had
> the same issue in the java 6 -> 7 move, remember?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Steve Loughran (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
> Date: Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:33 PM
> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16219) Hadoop branch-2 to set java
> language version to 1.8
> To: <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
>
>
> Steve Loughran created HADOOP-16219:
> ---------------------------------------
>
>              Summary: Hadoop branch-2 to set java language version to 1.8
>                  Key: HADOOP-16219
>                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16219
>              Project: Hadoop Common
>           Issue Type: Improvement
>           Components: build
>     Affects Versions: 2.10.0
>             Reporter: Steve Loughran
>
>
> Java 7 is long EOL; having branch-2 require it is simply making the release
> process a pain (we aren't building, testing, or releasing on java 7 JVMs
> any more, are we?).
>
> Staying on java 7 complicates backporting, JAR updates for CVEs (hello
> Guava!) &c are becoming impossible.
>
> Proposed: increment javac.version = 1.8
>

Reply via email to