On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:25 AM Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve, > > The proposal is to EOL for the following branches: > > [2.0.x - 2.7.x] > [3.0.x] > > 2.8.x, 2.9.x, 2.10.x (not released yet), 3.1.x (and later) are not EOL. > one final 2.8.x, 1+ for 2.9, and then we have to start thinking 2.10 as a "last ever branch- release". Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is actively using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy. Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?" > Thoughts? > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:40 AM Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:03 AM Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive), >>> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1] >>> >> >> 3.0 inclusive? i.e the non EOl ones being 2.8+ and 3.1+? >> >
