+1 binding.

        - Verified hashes and signatures
        - Built from source
        - Ran Freon Random key generator
        - Verified unit tests


Thanks Dinesh for driving the release.

Thanks
Shashi

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:58 AM Xiaoyu Yao <x...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 binding
> Download source and verify signature.
> Verify build and documents.
> Deployed an 11 node cluster (3 om with ha, 6 datanodes, 1 scm and 1 s3g)
> Verify multiple RATIS-3 pipelines are created as expected.
> Tried ozone shell commands via o3 and o3fs, focus on security and HA
> related.
>  Only find a few minor issues that we can fix in followup JIRAs.
> 1) ozone getconf -ozonemanagers does not return all the om instances
> bash-4.2$ ozone getconf -ozonemanagers
> 0.0.0.0
> 2) The document on specifying service/ID can be improved. More
> specifically, the URI should give examples for the Service ID in HA.
> Currently, it only mentions host/port.
>
> ozone sh vol create /vol1
> Service ID or host name must not be omitted when ozone.om.service.ids is
> defined.
> bash-4.2$ ozone sh vol create --help
> Usage: ozone sh volume create [-hV] [--root] [-q=<quota>] [-u=<userName>]
> <uri>
> Creates a volume for the specified user
>       <uri>               URI of the volume.
>                           Ozone URI could start with o3:// or without
> prefix. URI
>                             may contain the host and port of the OM server.
> Both are
>                             optional. If they are not specified it will be
>                             identified from the config files.
> 3). ozone scmcli container list seems report incorrect numberOfKeys and
> usedBytes
> Also, container owner is set as the current leader om(om3), should we use
> the om service id here instead?
> bash-4.2$ ozone scmcli container list
> {
>   "state" : "OPEN",
>   "replicationFactor" : "THREE",
>   "replicationType" : "RATIS",
>   "usedBytes" : 3813,
>   "numberOfKeys" : 1,
> ...
> bash-4.2$ ozone sh key list o3://id1/vol1/bucket1/
> {
>   "volumeName" : "vol1",
>   "bucketName" : "bucket1",
>   "name" : "k1",
>   "dataSize" : 3813,
>   "creationTime" : "2020-03-23T03:23:30.670Z",
>   "modificationTime" : "2020-03-23T03:23:33.207Z",
>   "replicationType" : "RATIS",
>   "replicationFactor" : 3
> }
> {
>   "volumeName" : "vol1",
>   "bucketName" : "bucket1",
>   "name" : "k2",
>   "dataSize" : 3813,
>   "creationTime" : "2020-03-23T03:18:46.735Z",
>   "modificationTime" : "2020-03-23T03:20:15.005Z",
>   "replicationType" : "RATIS",
>   "replicationFactor" : 3
> }
>
>
> Run freon with random key generation.
>
> Thanks Dinesh for driving the the release of Beta RC2.
>
> Xiaoyu
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 2:51 PM Aravindan Vijayan
> <avija...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Deployed a 3 node cluster
> > Tried ozone shell and filesystem commands
> > Ran freon load generator
> >
> > Thanks Dinesh for working on the RC2.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 7:27 PM Dinesh Chitlangia <dineshc....@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > We have put together RC2 for Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.5.0-beta.
> > >
> > > The RC artifacts are at:
> > > https://home.apache.org/~dineshc/ozone-0.5.0-rc2/
> > >
> > > The public key used for signing the artifacts can be found at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
> > >
> > > The maven artifacts are staged at:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1262
> > >
> > > The RC tag in git is at:
> > > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/tree/ozone-0.5.0-beta-RC2
> > >
> > > This release contains 800+ fixes/improvements [1].
> > > Thanks to everyone who put in the effort to make this happen.
> > >
> > > *The vote will run for 7 days, ending on March 22nd 2020 at 11:59 pm
> > PST.*
> > >
> > > Note: This release is beta quality, it’s not recommended to use in
> > > production but we believe that it’s stable enough to try out the
> feature
> > > set and collect feedback.
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://s.apache.org/ozone-0.5.0-fixed-issues
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dinesh Chitlangia
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to