+1 . Yes this will be great!

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 7:31 PM Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@apache.org> wrote:

> Sounds good! I have a few small patches remaining on the feature branch
> that need committer reviews. Once these are reviewed and committed, I'll
> refresh the full merge PR and start the [VOTE] thread.
>
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7874
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7877
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7883
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7891
>
> Chris Nauroth
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 3:47 AM Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I'm in favour of that merge...if there are problems we can fix in the
> repo.
> > Having it merged is the way to get a broader test environment and so find
> > those problems.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > (who has the google 3.1.3 branch open in an IDE right now)
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 19:21, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a discussion on merging the HADOOP-19343 branch (GCS
> > > FileSystem) to trunk for inclusion in the 3.5.0 release.
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > >
> > >    - Issue HADOOP-19343 contains the original proposal and discussion.
> > >    - Development has proceeded according to that proposal, primarily
> > driven
> > >    by Arunkumar Chacko <aruncha...@google.com> with code reviews and
> > >    commits by me.
> > >    - This is largely a port of the existing Apache-licensed GCS
> > FileSystem
> > >    codebase, which has been running successfully in production
> > environments
> > >    for multiple years.
> > >    - We think we've reached a feature-complete state for 3.5.0 with
> > >    integration test coverage and documentation. Subsequent enhancements
> > can
> > >    target future releases.
> > >    - I've opened a pull request for the merge to see how pre-commit
> likes
> > >    it.
> > >    - I think we still need reviews and updates of license information
> > >    before we proceed with the merge.
> > >
> > > Please let us know your feedback. If there are no objections raised
> for a
> > > few days, I'll proceed to a [VOTE].
> > >
> > > Chris Nauroth
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to