[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-5073:
-------------------------------------------
Attachment: c5073_20090825.png
c5073_20090825.patch
> It turned out to be better to have separate annotations for each of the
> possible labels: IDE integration was much better and the values show up more
> clearly in the Javadoc and IDE integreated Javadoc viewer.
Hi Jakob, how are the separated annotations better than a single annotation
with a parameter?
c5073_20090825.patch: I tried a little example. It seems that a single
annotation works well.
c5073_20090825.png: the javadoc screen shot.
> Hadoop 1.0 Interface Classification - scope (visibility - public/private) and
> stability
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5073
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5073
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sanjay Radia
> Assignee: Sanjay Radia
> Attachments: 5073_demo.png, c5073_20090825.patch, c5073_20090825.png,
> HADOOP-5073.patch
>
>
> This jira proposes an interface classification for hadoop interfaces.
> The discussion was started in email alias core-...@hadoop.apache.org in Nov
> 2008.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
