[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12751292#action_12751292
]
stack commented on HADOOP-4675:
-------------------------------
Thanks lads.
@Matt: Does it compile for you? I get this when I apply to current common
TRUNK:
{code}
[javac] Compiling 126 source files to
/Users/stack/checkouts/common/trunk/build/test/core/classes
[javac]
/Users/stack/checkouts/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/metrics/TestGangliaContext31.java:31:
package org.apache.hadoop.hdfs does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster;
[javac] ^
{code}
Here's my version:
{code}
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 811214
...
{code}
Common doesn't bundle hdfs. I'm doing something wrong or the test no longer
suits after the refactoring of hadoop into different modules.
If no minidfscluster available in common, then the test doesn't fit the new
constrained environment (though the test is creative with its setup of a
listener to catch and verify the ganglia emissions). I'd be grand w/ removing
the test. What you all think?
> Current Ganglia metrics implementation is incompatible with Ganglia 3.1
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-4675
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4675
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: metrics
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: Brian Bockelman
> Assignee: Brian Bockelman
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
> Attachments: hadoop-4675-2.patch, hadoop-4675-3.patch,
> HADOOP-4675-4.patch, HADOOP-4675-v5.patch, HADOOP-4675-v6.patch,
> HADOOP-4675-v7.patch, HADOOP-4675-v8.patch, HADOOP-4675-v9.patch,
> hadoop-4675.patch
>
>
> Ganglia changed its wire protocol in the 3.1.x series; the current
> implementation only works for 3.0.x.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
