[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833921#action_12833921
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6545:
-----------------------------------
+1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12435891/6545-2.patch
against trunk revision 910169.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/361/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/361/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/361/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/361/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Cached FileSystem objects can lead to wrong token being used in setting up
> connections
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6545
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6545
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: Devaraj Das
> Assignee: Devaraj Das
> Fix For: 0.22.0
>
> Attachments: 6545-1.patch, 6545-2.patch
>
>
> The FileSystem class caches the filesystem objects that it creates for users.
> For some cases, e.g., if the filesystem object is actually a
> DistributedFileSystem, it also has an associated RPC client and hence an UGI
> for the respective user. This could lead to issues to do with using the right
> credentials when connecting with the namenode. The credentials in the UGI is
> never updated (even if the user in question now has new credentials) and in
> case the cached UGI's credentials have expired, this would lead to
> authentication error whenever there is a re-authentication (in the process of
> re-establishing connection to the namenode).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.