[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863928#action_12863928
]
Neil Bliss commented on HADOOP-6704:
------------------------------------
I ran findbugs locally before submitting the -4 version of the patch, and it
came back clean. I can't help but wonder why I'm seeing different results from
Hudson. The findbugs complaint is now that I don't have ChunkInfo.hashCode()
implemented. I'll implement that, and resubmit to see what Hudson has to say
then.
> add support for Parascale filesystem
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6704
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 0.20.2
> Reporter: Neil Bliss
> Fix For: 0.20.3
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-6704-2.patch, HADOOP-6704-3.patch,
> HADOOP-6704-4.patch, HADOOP-6704.0.20.2.patch, HADOOP-6704.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows
> users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute
> this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or
> integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
