[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12866257#action_12866257
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6760:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12444225/HADOOP-6760.0.20.patch
against trunk revision 941662.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
-1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/515/console
This message is automatically generated.
> WebServer shouldn't increase port number in case of negative port setting
> caused by Jetty's race
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6760
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.20.3
> Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
> Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik
> Attachments: HADOOP-6760.0.20.patch, HADOOP-6760.patch
>
>
> When a negative port is assigned to a webserver socket (because of a race
> inside of the Jetty server) the workaround from HADOOP-6386 is increasing the
> original port number on the next bind attempt. Apparently, this is an
> incorrect logic and next bind attempt should happen on the same port number
> if possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
