[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15120323#comment-15120323
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HADOOP-12699:
------------------------------------

Great analysis [~xiaochen]! I think the above sequence does cause an EDEK 
generated from the old EZ key to be returned.

The approach in the patch is reasonable.

I wonder if there's anything we can do on the entrance of {{keyQueue}}? E.g. 
compare {{keyProviderCryptoExtension.getCurrentKey()}} and the 
{{encryptionKeyVersionName}} of the added key?

> TestKMS#testKMSProvider intermittently fails during 'test rollover draining'
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-12699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12699
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Xiao Chen
>            Assignee: Xiao Chen
>         Attachments: HADOOP-12699.01.patch, HADOOP-12699.02.patch, 
> HADOOP-12699.03.patch, HADOOP-12699.04.patch, HADOOP-12699.06.patch, 
> HADOOP-12699.07.patch, HADOOP-12699.repro.2, HADOOP-12699.repro.patch
>
>
> I've seen several failures of testKMSProvider, all failed in the following 
> snippet:
> {code}
>         // test rollover draining
>         KeyProviderCryptoExtension kpce = KeyProviderCryptoExtension.
>             createKeyProviderCryptoExtension(kp);
>         .....
>         EncryptedKeyVersion ekv1 = kpce.generateEncryptedKey("k6");
>         kpce.rollNewVersion("k6");
>         EncryptedKeyVersion ekv2 = kpce.generateEncryptedKey("k6");
>         Assert.assertNotEquals(ekv1.getEncryptionKeyVersionName(),
>             ekv2.getEncryptionKeyVersionName());
> {code}
> with error message
> {quote}Values should be different. Actual: k6@0{quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to