[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15328864#comment-15328864
 ] 

Rajesh Balamohan commented on HADOOP-13203:
-------------------------------------------

Thanks for sharing the details. Would that mean 
{{GetObjectRequest.withRange(targetPos, requestedStreamLen)}} would be block 
aligned as well?.
Forward seek cost in latest patch is {{fileLen/blockSize}}. Backward seek is 
soft close of the current connection (by reading the remaining data till the 
block size) and requesting for fresh data.


> S3a: Consider reducing the number of connection aborts by setting correct 
> length in s3 request
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-13203
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13203
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>            Reporter: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Assignee: Rajesh Balamohan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HADOOP-13203-branch-2-001.patch, 
> HADOOP-13203-branch-2-002.patch, HADOOP-13203-branch-2-003.patch
>
>
> Currently file's "contentLength" is set as the "requestedStreamLen", when 
> invoking S3AInputStream::reopen().  As a part of lazySeek(), sometimes the 
> stream had to be closed and reopened. But lots of times the stream was closed 
> with abort() causing the internal http connection to be unusable. This incurs 
> lots of connection establishment cost in some jobs.  It would be good to set 
> the correct value for the stream length to avoid connection aborts. 
> I will post the patch once aws tests passes in my machine.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to