[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15419263#comment-15419263
]
Thomas Poepping commented on HADOOP-13344:
------------------------------------------
so let's say I'm a maven based consumer of hadoop client, i.e. I have a
dependency on some hadoop-client artifact in my pomfile. What would you
suggest? How would I include or exclude this binding in my dependency tree?
There's already a builtin way to exclude it -- using <exclusions>. Why go
around that?
> Add option to exclude Hadoop's SLF4J binding
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13344
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: bin, scripts
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.2
> Reporter: Thomas Poepping
> Assignee: Thomas Poepping
> Labels: patch
> Attachments: HADOOP-13344.patch
>
>
> If another application that uses the Hadoop classpath brings in its own SLF4J
> binding for logging, and that jar is not the exact same as the one brought in
> by Hadoop, then there will be a conflict between logging jars between the two
> classpaths. This patch introduces an optional setting to remove Hadoop's
> SLF4J binding from the classpath, to get rid of this problem.
> This patch should be applied to 2.8.0, as bin/ and hadoop-config.sh structure
> has been changed in 3.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
