[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15450757#comment-15450757
]
Atul Sikaria commented on HADOOP-13508:
---------------------------------------
Looks reasonable - thanks Chris.
Agree that the general parsing approach here should be looked at in the future,
but this addresses current problem of not being able to parse valid permission
strings.
> FsPermission's string constructor fails on valid permissions like "1777"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13508
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Atul Sikaria
> Assignee: Atul Sikaria
> Attachments: HADOOP-13508-1.patch, HADOOP-13508-2.patch,
> HADOOP-13508.003.patch, HADOOP-13508.004.patch, HADOOP-13508.005.patch,
> HADOOP-13508.006.patch
>
>
> FsPermissions's string constructor breaks on valid permission strings, like
> "1777".
> This is because FsPermission class naïvely uses UmaskParser to do it’s
> parsing of permissions: (from source code):
> public FsPermission(String mode) {
> this((new UmaskParser(mode)).getUMask());
> }
> The mode string UMask accepts is subtly different (esp wrt sticky bit), so
> parsing Umask is not the same as parsing FsPermission.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
