[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15470367#comment-15470367
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-13541:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #10404 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/10404/])
HADOOP-13541 explicitly declare the Joda time version S3A depends on. (stevel: 
rev 7fdfcd8a6c9e2dd9b0fb6d4196bc371f6f9a676c)
* (edit) hadoop-project/pom.xml
* (edit) hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/pom.xml


> explicitly declare the Joda time version S3A depends on
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-13541
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13541
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: build, fs/s3
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.3
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-13541-branch-2.8-001.patch
>
>
> Different builds of Hadoop are pulling in wildly different versions of Joda 
> time, depending on what other transitive dependencies are involved. Example: 
> 2.7.3 is somehow picking up Joda time 2.9.4; branch-2.8 is actually behind on 
> 2.8.1. That's going to cause confusion when people upgrade from 2.7.x to 2.8 
> and find a dependency has got older
> I propose explicitly declaring a dependency on joda-time in s3a, then set the 
> version to 2.9.4; upgrades are things we can manage



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to