[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12964611#action_12964611
]
Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7049:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Perhaps file a separate jira if you think we should switch them all over to
be explicit.
I don't suggest to change them all over the place but I don't see why we need
to add insult to injury and keep doing this for the test code while it isn't
welcome for the rest of the code. Besides [a similar
question|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7014?focusedCommentId=12931310&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12931310]
has been raised before
> TestReconfiguration should be junit v4
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-7049
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7049
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: conf
> Affects Versions: 0.23.0
> Reporter: Patrick Kling
> Assignee: Patrick Kling
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-7049.2.patch, HADOOP-7049.patch
>
>
> TestReconfiguration should be a junit v4 unit test. I'll also add some
> messages to the assertions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
