[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12975871#action_12975871
]
Karl Heinz Marbaise commented on HADOOP-7080:
---------------------------------------------
I have first tried to set dfs.block.size in the hdfs-site.xml file and nothing
else, cause i didn't known anything about the new name. I have copied the
configuration (hdfs-site.xml) to all data nodes (only three in my case) and
checked that several times. Completely removed all contents from the HDFS
storage and reformatted the namenode (removed also the data directories from
the data nodes). It doesn't change anything. The files in HDFS used 64 MiB
block size based on the display in the file system browser (Web-UI). After
that i changed the name from dfs.block.size to dfs.blocksize in the
hdfs-site.xml file. And then completely removed things from cluster etc. and
from that point it worked. Now the change of the block size via command line
option like this:
{{hadoop fs -Ddfs.blocksize=67108864 -copyFromLocal result.log
/user/km/tapelogs/logfile-test-64MB.log}} works.
I tried several time with the following:
{{hadoop fs -Ddfs.block.size=134217728 -copyFromLocal result.log
/user/km/tapelogs/logfile-test-64MB.log}} but this didn't work either. So in my
opinion this is not only a documentation bug.
> Documentation dfs.block.size where dfs.blocksize has to be used instead.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-7080
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7080
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Environment: Linux (Ubuntu)
> Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Priority: Minor
>
> The configuration for the block size is named *dfs.block.size* in the
> [documentation for Release 0.21.0 of
> Hadoop|http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.21.0/cluster_setup.html] but
> this will not work nor will it be recognized. If i use
> [*dfs.blocksize*|http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/api/constant-values.html]
> instead it will work perfectly. So this seemed to be a documentation bug.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.