[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15647834#comment-15647834
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-13345:
-----------------------------------------
thanks: sorry for breaking things —it's the price of working against a changing
part of the codebase. Now I'm involved in this branch as well (a) I'll have
less time to break things on branch-2 and (b) I'll be more aware of what I've
just broken.
FWIW I don't think you need to do rebase here, merging is better for
collaboration, and avoids that hell of having to fix up some patch conflict
over a class you know gets deleted later. When this gets pulled into
trunk/branch-2, it'll be done as a squashed merge, so there's no harm in doing
merges here rather than rebase
> S3Guard: Improved Consistency for S3A
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13345
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs/s3
> Reporter: Chris Nauroth
> Assignee: Chris Nauroth
> Attachments: HADOOP-13345.prototype1.patch,
> S3C-ConsistentListingonS3-Design.pdf, S3GuardImprovedConsistencyforS3A.pdf,
> S3GuardImprovedConsistencyforS3AV2.pdf, s3c.001.patch
>
>
> This issue proposes S3Guard, a new feature of S3A, to provide an option for a
> stronger consistency model than what is currently offered. The solution
> coordinates with a strongly consistent external store to resolve
> inconsistencies caused by the S3 eventual consistency model.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
