[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12979033#action_12979033
 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6904:
--------------------------------------

I just remembered that Class#getMethods() does not return methods in any 
particular order, and I believe that Arrays#hashCode() is order-dependent.  So 
the methods need to be sorted by name before they are hashed.

Note that Java Serialization defines a good hashing method as the default 
definition for serialVersionUID:

http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/platform/serialization/spec/class.html#4100

This can be accessed with 
ObjectStreamClass.lookup(iface).getSerialVersionUID().  Unfortunately the 
protocol has to extend java.io.Serializeable, and we'd need to check that 
explicitly, as this method returns 0 for non-Serializeable interfaces, but this 
still might be a good way to get a well designed hash-function for interfaces.

> A baby step towards inter-version RPC communications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: ipc
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Hairong Kuang
>            Assignee: Hairong Kuang
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: majorMinorVersion.patch, majorMinorVersion1.patch, 
> rpcCompatible-trunk.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk1.patch, 
> rpcCompatible-trunk2.patch, rpcVersion.patch, rpcVersion1.patch
>
>
> Currently RPC communications in Hadoop is very strict. If a client has a 
> different version from that of the server, a VersionMismatched exception is 
> thrown and the client can not connect to the server. This force us to update 
> both client and server all at once if a RPC protocol is changed. But sometime 
> different versions do not mean the client & server are not compatible. It 
> would be nice if we could relax this restriction and allows us to support 
> inter-version communications.
> My idea is that DfsClient catches VersionMismatched exception when it 
> connects to NameNode. It then checks if the client & the server is 
> compatible. If yes, it sets the NameNode version in the dfs client and allows 
> the client to continue talking to NameNode. Otherwise, rethrow the 
> VersionMismatch exception.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to