[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15798037#comment-15798037
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-11452:
-----------------------------------------
note that we could consider adding a new enum operation
{{Rename.ATOMIC_REQUIRED}} which will fail if atomicity is not supported; raise
some special IOE to indicate this requirement is not met, allowing callers to
recognise and fallback. Local FS rename will not be atomic due to the stricter
checks beyond the java API; it would be a requirement of posix FS clients to
decide what to do here
> Revisit FileSystem.rename(path, path, options)
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11452
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 2.7.3
> Reporter: Yi Liu
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
>
> Currently in {{FileSystem}}, {{rename}} with _Rename options_ is protected
> and with _deprecated_ annotation. And the default implementation is not
> atomic.
> So this method is not able to be used outside. On the other hand, HDFS has a
> good and atomic implementation. (Also an interesting thing in {{DFSClient}},
> the _deprecated_ annotations for these two methods are opposite).
> It makes sense to make public for {{rename}} with _Rename options_, since
> it's atomic for rename+overwrite, also it saves RPC calls if user desires
> rename+overwrite.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
