[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980920#action_12980920
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6904:
--------------------------------------
Is there a reason why you don't just add the protocol's fingerprint as a field
of ProtocolSignature, instead defining a wrapper class? The methods are also
still hashed twice in the cache fault case, but that's probably not a
significant problem.
> A baby step towards inter-version RPC communications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: ipc
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: Hairong Kuang
> Assignee: Hairong Kuang
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
> Attachments: majorMinorVersion.patch, majorMinorVersion1.patch,
> rpcCompatible-trunk.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk1.patch,
> rpcCompatible-trunk2.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk4.patch,
> rpcCompatible-trunk5.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk6.patch,
> rpcCompatible-trunk7.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk8.patch, rpcVersion.patch,
> rpcVersion1.patch
>
>
> Currently RPC communications in Hadoop is very strict. If a client has a
> different version from that of the server, a VersionMismatched exception is
> thrown and the client can not connect to the server. This force us to update
> both client and server all at once if a RPC protocol is changed. But sometime
> different versions do not mean the client & server are not compatible. It
> would be nice if we could relax this restriction and allows us to support
> inter-version communications.
> My idea is that DfsClient catches VersionMismatched exception when it
> connects to NameNode. It then checks if the client & the server is
> compatible. If yes, it sets the NameNode version in the dfs client and allows
> the client to continue talking to NameNode. Otherwise, rethrow the
> VersionMismatch exception.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
