[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12984615#action_12984615
]
Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-6304:
---------------------------------------
Ah, I was looking at each set* and thinking they are fine since each is a JNI
call individually... thanks for the explanation.
+1 for marking this invalid in favour of HADOOP-7110.
> Use java.io.File.set{Readable|Writable|Executable} where possible in
> RawLocalFileSystem
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6304
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 0.20.1
> Reporter: Arun C Murthy
> Assignee: Arun C Murthy
> Attachments: HADOOP-6304_yhadoop20.patch
>
>
> Using java.io.File.set{Readable|Writable|Executable} where possible in
> RawLocalFileSystem when g & o perms are same saves a lot of 'fork'
> system-calls.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
