[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15867080#comment-15867080
]
Kai Sasaki commented on HADOOP-13665:
-------------------------------------
[~jojochuang] Very sorry for late response and thanks for pinging.
{quote}
So adding a new codec like NATIVE_XOR_CODEC_NAME doesn't make sense.
{quote}
I'll remove native codec configuration to make it transparently. But how can we
specify native coder? If Java implementation is always preferred over native
coder, there is no way to use native coder, I think. Does it mean it is
unnecessary fallback any coder?
> Erasure Coding codec should support fallback coder
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13665
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: io
> Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
> Assignee: Kai Sasaki
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: hdfs-ec-3.0-must-do
> Attachments: HADOOP-13665.01.patch, HADOOP-13665.02.patch,
> HADOOP-13665.03.patch, HADOOP-13665.04.patch
>
>
> The current EC codec supports a single coder only (by default pure Java
> implementation). If the native coder is specified but is unavailable, it
> should fallback to pure Java implementation.
> One possible solution is to follow the convention of existing Hadoop native
> codec, such as transport encryption (see {{CryptoCodec.java}}). It supports
> fallback by specifying two or multiple coders as the value of property, and
> loads coders in order.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
