[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15881411#comment-15881411
]
Mingliang Liu edited comment on HADOOP-13994 at 2/23/17 10:24 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry [[email protected]] I missed this point when I did the merge from
{{trunk}} to [HADOOP-13345] feature branch. When I merged, I was still thinking
that we didn't have to exclude this dependency explicitly in DDBLocal. Then I
realized that the AWS shaded uber jar does not include DDBLocal package (which
clearly has its own maven repository).
# Should we make this a subtask of [HADOOP-13345] Uber JIRA? Tracking there
seems helpful to me at least.
# Should we file a new JIRA to add this effort back (only need change in
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/pom.xml for DDBLocal exclusion tag), or re-open this
and commit an addendum patch?
Thanks!
was (Author: liuml07):
Sorry [[email protected]] I missed this point when I did the merge from
{{trunk}} to [HADOOP-13345] feature branch. When I merged, I was still thinking
that we didn't have to exclude this dependency explicitly in DDBLocal. Then I
realized that the AWS shaded uber jar does not include DDBLocal package (which
clearly has its own maven repository).
# Should we make this a subtask of [HADOOP-13345] Uber JIRA? Tracking there
seems helpful to me at least.
# Should we file a new JIRA to add this effort back (only in
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/pom.xml for DDBLocal exclusion tag), or re-open this
and commit an addendum patch?
Thanks!
> explicitly declare the commons-lang3 dependency as 3.4
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13994
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build, fs/azure, fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2, HADOOP-13345
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Fix For: HADOOP-13345
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-13994-HADOOP-13345-001.patch,
> HADOOP-13994-HADOOP-13445-001.patch
>
>
> Other people aren't seeing this (yet?), but unless you explicitly exclude v
> 3.4 of commons-lang3 from the azure build (which HADOOP-13660 does), then the
> dependency declaration of commons-lang3 v 3.3.2 is creating a resolution
> conflict. That's a dependency only needed for the local dynamodb & tests.
> I propose to fix this in s3guard by explicitly declaring the version used in
> the tests to be that of the azure-storage one, excluding that you get for
> free. It doesn't impact anything shipped in production, but puts the hadoop
> build in control of what versions of commons-lang are coming in everywhere by
> way of the commons-config version declared in hadoop-common
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
