[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mingliang Liu updated HADOOP-13946:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 3.44.43 PM.png
Chris' comment makes sense to me. I slightly changed the v4 patch and uploaded
the v5 one for addressing that. Specially, the "*but" was changed to "but"
removing the "*". I think we can live without that. For wasb:// linking problem
I used ` to wrap it as code as `wasb://`. Also fixed typo "artificially".
Preview from my screenshot [#Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 3.44.43 PM.png].
I'm assuming the v5 patch inherits all the +1s on v4 patch; will commit in 3
days if no objections.
> Document how HDFS updates timestamps in the FS spec; compare with object
> stores
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13946
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation, fs
> Affects Versions: 2.7.3
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-13946-001.patch, HADOOP-13946-002.patch,
> HADOOP-13946-003.patch, HADOOP-13946-004.patch, HADOOP-13946-005.patch,
> Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 3.44.43 PM.png
>
>
> SPARK-17159 shows that the behavior of when HDFS updates timestamps isn't
> well documented. Document these in the FS spec.
> I'm not going to add tests for this, as it is so very dependent on FS
> implementations, as in "POSIX filesystems may behave differently from HDFS".
> If someone knows what happens there, their contribution is welcome.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
