[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15935814#comment-15935814
]
Omkar Aradhya K S commented on HADOOP-11794:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks for the clarification [~yzhangal].
About this ...
{quote}
About other file systems, I did not get to test various file systems with this
patch (except for DistributedFileSystem), we could follow-up with new jira to
relax the file system requirement, and add corresponding tests for the
corresponding file system?
{quote}
Is there any reason *not* to use *FileSystem.concat* &
*FileSystem.getFileBlockLocations* ?
> distcp can copy blocks in parallel
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11794
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tools/distcp
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
> Attachments: HADOOP-11794.001.patch, HADOOP-11794.002.patch,
> HADOOP-11794.003.patch, HADOOP-11794.004.patch, HADOOP-11794.005.patch,
> HADOOP-11794.006.patch, HADOOP-11794.007.patch, HADOOP-11794.008.patch,
> MAPREDUCE-2257.patch
>
>
> The minimum unit of work for a distcp task is a file. We have files that are
> greater than 1 TB with a block size of 1 GB. If we use distcp to copy these
> files, the tasks either take a long long long time or finally fails. A better
> way for distcp would be to copy all the source blocks in parallel, and then
> stich the blocks back to files at the destination via the HDFS Concat API
> (HDFS-222)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
