[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15937180#comment-15937180
]
Mingliang Liu commented on HADOOP-14215:
----------------------------------------
This was to some degree discussed in [HADOOP-13908] and in that patch
waitForActive() may not be skipped.
> DynamoDB client should waitForActive on existing tables
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14215
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14215
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fs/s3
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
>
> I saw a case where 2 separate applications tried to use the same
> non-pre-existing table with table.create = true at about the same time. One
> failed with a ResourceInUse exception. If a table does not exist, we attempt
> to create it and then wait for it to enter the active state. If another jumps
> in in the middle of that, the table may exist, thus bypassing our call to
> waitForActive(), and then try to use the table immediately.
> While we're at it, let's also make sure that the race condition where a table
> might get created between checking if it exists and attempting to create it
> is handled gracefully.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
