[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15950305#comment-15950305
 ] 

Mingliang Liu commented on HADOOP-14236:
----------------------------------------

Thank you very much for your insightful comments and review, [~fabbri]!

> S3Guard: S3AFileSystem::rename() should move non-listed sub-directory entries 
> in metadata store
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14236
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>            Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>            Assignee: Mingliang Liu
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: HADOOP-13345
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14236-HADOOP-13345.000.patch, 
> HADOOP-14236-HADOOP-13345.001.patch, HADOOP-14236-HADOOP-13345.002.patch, 
> HADOOP-14236-HADOOP-13345.003.patch, HADOOP-14236-HADOOP-13345.004.patch
>
>
> After running integration test {{ITestS3AFileSystemContract}}, I found the 
> following items are not cleaned up in DynamoDB:
> {code}
> parent=/mliu-s3guard/user/mliu/s3afilesystemcontract/testRenameDirectoryAsExisting/dir,
>  child=subdir
> parent=/mliu-s3guard/user/mliu/s3afilesystemcontract/testRenameDirectoryAsExistingNew/newdir/subdir,
>  child=file2
> {code}
> At first I thought it’s similar to [HADOOP-14226] or [HADOOP-14227], and we 
> need to be careful when cleaning up test data.
> Then I found it’s a bug(?) in the code of integrating S3Guard with 
> S3AFileSystem: for rename we miss sub-directory items to put (dest) and 
> delete (src). The reason is that in S3A, we delete those fake directory 
> objects if they are not necessary, e.g. non-empty. So when we list the 
> objects to rename, the object summaries will only return _file_ objects. This 
> has two consequences after rename:
> #  there will be left items for src path in metadata store - left-overs will 
> confuse {{get(Path)}} which should return null
> # we are not persisting the whole subtree for dest path to metadata store - 
> this will break the DynamoDBMetadataStore invariant: _if a path exists, all 
> its ancestors will also exist in the table_.
> UPDATE: modified test case {{ITestS3AFileSystemContract:: 
> testRenameDirectoryAsExistingDirectory()}} will fail w/o this patch; it 
> passes w/ this patch. If the test case makes sense, the proposal follows.
> Existing tests are not complaining about this though. If this is a real bug, 
> let’s address it here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to