[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972668#comment-15972668
]
Vikas Vishwakarma commented on HADOOP-14313:
--------------------------------------------
[~busbey] In test (ycsb, local tests) we are seeing 10-15% improvement on an
average on HBase side. For the second question, either ways is ok. One point
of view was that this is something very core to HBase and hence there should
not be a dependency on external library, but I guess approach might vary from
community to community.
> Replace/improve Hadoop's byte[] comparator
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14313
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: common
> Reporter: Vikas Vishwakarma
> Attachments: HADOOP-14313.master.001.patch
>
>
> Hi,
> Recently we were looking at the Lexicographic byte array comparison in HBase.
> We did microbenchmark for the byte array comparator of HADOOP (
> https://github.com/hanborq/hadoop/blob/master/src/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/FastByteComparisons.java#L161
> ) , HBase Vs the latest byte array comparator from guava (
> https://github.com/google/guava/blob/master/guava/src/com/google/common/primitives/UnsignedBytes.java#L362
> ) and observed that the guava main branch version is much faster.
> Specifically we see very good improvement when the byteArraySize%8 != 0 and
> also for large byte arrays. I will update the benchmark results using JMH for
> Hadoop vs Guava. For the jira on HBase, please refer HBASE-17877.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
